On September 2, Meta released Muse Spark 1.3, its most powerful model to date, and Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang described it as "the company's biggest performance leap," positioning it alongside OpenAI's and Anthropic's most recent models.
According to Artificial Analysis, Muse Spark 1.3 scored 62 on its Intelligence Index, trailing only Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5, and ahead of the OpenAI models evaluated. Wang said the model is "competitive" with Claude Fable 5.1 and "better" than OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, particularly on coding tasks. On efficiency, Meta reports that Muse Spark 1.3 uses roughly 25% fewer tokens than version 1.2 to complete equivalent tasks, with roughly 20% fewer tool calls according to engineering tests the company reported.
Meta kept Muse Spark 1.3's price the same as Spark 1.2's, positioning it as "one of the most accessible LLMs on the market." API access is already available for developers paying by usage, while rollout to Facebook, Instagram and the Meta AI app users will arrive in the coming days. Meta hasn't yet decided whether it will release the model's weights openly, a departure from its historical strategy with the Llama family.
Meta landing, by its own metrics and Artificial Analysis's, in third place on the intelligence ranking — behind Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5, and ahead of the OpenAI models evaluated — confirms that the competitive gap between frontier labs keeps narrowing every few weeks. For a company that has already built its stack around a specific model, this isn't a reason to migrate immediately, but it is a reason to keep the LLM architecture decoupled from the provider, so that switching models is a configuration decision rather than a rewrite.
Carlos Montiel is an enterprise AI solutions architect. He implements LLMs, Agents, RAG and orchestrators for companies across Guatemala and Latin America. Reach out for a consultation.
Contact Carlos Montiel