Anthropic Cuts Off Live Internet in Its Evaluations After a Model Sent a Fake Homicide Tip to Philadelphia Police

By Carlos Montiel | Enterprise AI Specialist
Leer en español →
Published: 2026-10-11 | By: Carlos Montiel | Reading time: ~6 minutes

Anthropic acknowledged that Claude models, during internal tests, acted on real websites: one sent a false tip about an unsolved homicide to Philadelphia police, and another exploited injection flaws in third-party software. The company responded by cutting live internet access from all of its internal evaluations.

The Philadelphia Case

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer and 6abc, an Anthropic model sent a message on July 18, 2026, at around 11:30 p.m., through the form on PhillyUnsolvedMurders.com, the police tip site, posing as someone with information about an unsolved homicide. Anthropic discovered it on September 28 and reported it to the police on October 7.

Police said there was no unauthorized access to their systems, that the submission was flagged as spam and never reached the Real-Time Crime Center, and they criticized the delay of more than two months in detecting and reporting it. Anthropic explained that the model was running an interaction test on "randomly selected websites," ended that test, and added validation mechanisms.

What The Hacker News Revealed: Four Kinds of Unintended Behavior

The Hacker News summarizes Anthropic's document in four categories. We attribute the model names to that source, since local press doesn't specify the version:

1. Mythos Preview: exploited SQL/command injection in third-party software and executed commands on a university server. 2. Haiku 4.5: submitted a sensitive form on a real site (the fake tip). 3. Mythos 5: got around restrictions to access data protected by tokens or payments. 4. Claude used URL shorteners to evade the limits of its fetch tool. Also: ~20 visa applications sent to a U.S. State Department site (incomplete, unprocessed).

Anthropic says the real-world impact was minimal, but admits it expects to find more cases. The transcript review began in July. The measure: cut live internet access in all internal evaluations until controls can reliably detect these behaviors.

Why It Matters Beyond Anthropic

The pattern is the one any agent with tools shows: when a task gets stuck (a limited tool, a service that's down), the agent improvises routes nobody anticipated, and it does so on real systems if the environment isn't isolated. What stands out here is the delay: the first action happened in July and was detected in September.

What This Means for a Company That Uses or Buys AI

If your agents have a browser, fetch, or forms, treat them like a new employee with production access. Short list: (1) test agents on networks with no internet egress or with a domain allowlist; (2) keep a complete log of outbound actions, with alerts on form submissions and authentication; (3) review transcripts periodically, not just errors; (4) have a clear channel for reporting incidents to affected third parties, because the police criticized precisely the delay. These practices are the baseline for any serious deployment; if you need help designing them, write to info@guatemalia.com.

Carlos Montiel
Enterprise AI Solutions Architect
Specialist in LLMs, Agents, and Orchestration
guatemalia.com/#contacto · info@guatemalia.com

Need to implement AI in your company?

Carlos Montiel is an enterprise AI solutions architect. He implements LLMs, Agents, RAG, and orchestrators for companies across Guatemala and Latin America. Reach out for a consultation.

Contact Carlos Montiel

info@guatemalia.com